I
had the privilege of working the SAG Awards this past weekend which I thought I
had to post about considering it is probably one of the most notable events
that takes place every year featuring stars and celebrity. The SAG Awards are
unique because they specifically honor actors or “stars” achievement as opposed to a
culmination of cinematic talent in various areas such as directing,
screenwriting, and visual effects etc. that the Awards shows such as the Golden
Globes and Academy Awards recognize.
The SAG Awards are a particularly interesting event when
we think about stars and celebrity because those invited and those who attend
are generally those who are nominated for Awards but we do not have our “Kim
Kardashian, and Kylie Jenner” type reality based and self made stars in
attendance for this event. One of the interesting points about this weeks
reading was the chapter on how the film star developed and the way in which
talent was recognized preceded the development of the “star persona” that
certain stars were expected to perform and uphold certain standards outside
their film roles. Awards season in a way epitomizes the star as exhibiting a
certain level of talent based solely or primarily on their specific onscreen
performance as opposed to their “performance” in their everyday lives. The
recognition these stars receive from both their fans awaiting their arrival,
the photographers taking their photos on the red carpet, and ultimately the
publicity they receive should they win an award is due to their performance in
a specific film or television show. However,
to contrast this idea that it is purely their performance in particular role
that denotes certain individuals the “star quality” at the SAG awards was illustrated
by the fans excitement over the arrival of certain individuals in particular
film stars who have developed their persona from not only the role they were
being recognized for, but rather from the combination of multiple film roles
over the entirety of their career. This raises the question if Awards shows actually
highlight the achievement of a certain performance that occurred by a specific
actor during that year or rather highlight the strong star persona of a particular
individual that has been developed based on multiple film roles throughout
their career in which another performance only illuminates their star quality
but cannot necessary be associated with a particular level of talent.
For the red carpet portion of the show my job was simple
or at least I thought it would be – I was assigned to be the talent spotter
along with another individual who in turn we were in charge of announcing all
of the talent who arrived. What I found
was that I was caught in the same trap the fans across the street were in which
was I only really had an idea of who a particular star was if I had seen them
in various roles other than the ones they were nominated for. This means that I
was recognizing these stars based on their personas rather than their actual
role they were coming to the ceremony to be recognized for. The gray area
between distinguishing how we develop a certain respect or fan base for a
certain “star” is illustrated quite clearly when we think of Awards ceremonies
where it become difficult to distinguish on what timeline we actually develop our
respect for a certain individual and determine they are a star versus just an
actor nominated for an award because it would seemingly mean that if “star” is directly
correlated with talent then everyone arriving at the Awards ceremony should be
considered a star based purely on their level of talent and achievement.
However, this was not the case- there are presenters who arrive that clearly
have developed a larger “star personality” than those actually nominated which
was exhibited based on the ability to recognize them and excitement over their arrival,
level of security etc. that set them apart from their other colleagues who were
nominated for awards but were not necessarily considered the “stars.”
Another interesting quality about these Awards was the
way that instead of honoring specific individuals many awards are given to
entire casts. This is interesting because these casts are recognized as a whole
as opposed to giving credit to individuals with their given names or even
character names. I was assigned the job
of escorting the Downton Abbey Cast through all of their winning press and I
can personally attest to having absolutely no clue who the individual actors were
yet this was the winning cast who was being recognized for having the Best
Drama Series on TV this year thus shouldn't they be considered stars since
their level of talent has clearly set them apart? However, can we consider them
stars when the majority of us do not even know their name both character and
actual name? One interesting thing about several members of the cast was that
they have had relatively limited experience outside of that one show thus their
persona is largely constructed based solely on Downton Abbey thus raising the
question if their star power will follow due to the recognition they have received
based on their performance in that particular show or if their lack of filmic
roles will make it difficult for them to develop individual personas since they
are constantly grouped together as a cast and lack the ability to individualize
their performances with a variety of different casts throughout a variety of
different roles as film stars typically do. Lastly, this brings up the notion
of if we can group TV “stars” into the same group as film “stars.” While the SAG awards uniquely combines both
types of media the Academy Awards do not and considering those are typically thought
of as the most coveted awards to receive in Hollywood does this mean we are discounting
TV stars are less significant than film stars? If films are a dying medium and
the majority of content being produced will either be released in TV format or
online as opposed to theatrically how does it change our notion of who is a
star and celebrity and will the power of individual celebrities like Marilyn
Monroe and Judy Garland etc. become a concept of the past.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.